At "Mistaeks I Hav Made" Nat Pryce writes about an alternative to the Object Mother pattern that is based on the Builder pattern I blogged about previously. It looks like a useful application of the Builder pattern. Object Mother is a technique for creating test data for unit tests. I've used Object Mothers and the article is right that overtime they get messy and bloated.
In he last line of the article Nat says -
Which is a nice validation of underlying the Builder pattern. I wonder if they used the same builder, complete with the default values, in the production code or wrote new ones.
In he last line of the article Nat says -
"In some cases, Builders have so improved the code that they ended up being used in the production code as well."
Which is a nice validation of underlying the Builder pattern. I wonder if they used the same builder, complete with the default values, in the production code or wrote new ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment